TIE审稿意见求分析
新人所有金币都散出去
两个月前重新投的IEEE TIE,昨天给的大修结果,感觉评审意见挺狠的,这样能让大修已经不错了。
现在难点是我文章已经八页了(TIE规定页书),他们给了很多条评审意见,我要都加进去肯定超篇幅了,请前辈们指教怎么办,再投的话中的概率大吗?以下是审稿意见
Keio University, Yokohama, Japan, 04-Aug-2016
Dear Authors,
The review process of your manuscript No. 16-TIE-1627 entitled "Implant Position of Receiving Coils of the Wireless Charging System for the Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker" as a Regular paper submission, has been completed.
Based on the opinions of the reviewers and the Associate Editor in charge, your manuscript requires a major revision.
- Please revise your manuscript within 6 weeks to address the enclosed reviewers' comments, and highlight the changes in the manuscript. Your revised manuscript will be evaluated again.
- Please understand that the manuscript is still considered to be in the review process, so it is important that authors' names and affiliations must NOT be identifiable in any documents uploaded to Manuscript Central. Otherwise the paper will be automatically rejected.
Please note that if your revised manuscript exceeds the page limit of TIE (3 pages for "Letter to Editor" and 8 pages for regular and "Special Section" papers), extra page cost will be billed to you, according to the rate posted by IEEE. The manuscript length couldn't exceed 10 pages (5 pages for letters).
Your kind cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely yours,
Prof. Kouhei Ohnishi
Editor-in-Chief
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
个人感觉审稿意见还是挺能接受的啊,尤其是对Trans来说,已经算很温和的了,好好修改挺有希望的啊。。。
TIE允许超页到10页,跟编辑说需要补充的内容较多,不得已到10页,请编辑谅解。同时表明态度,愿意为超页部分支付版面费
必须要遵循每条意见啊,首先要把审稿人全部搞定了才能让编辑做决定。尤其是例如要你增加解释,然后改进结果等等可以提升文章质量的,一定要好好改。
但是例如上面我说的两个问题质疑你文章的贡献和novelty这种,一定要站住自己立场据理力争,不能被审稿人左右,这种问题的往往从AE的角度能决定整个文章的水平,回答不好很严重
,
严格按照审稿意见修改吧,尽量控制在八页以内