论文小修,审稿人意见不太懂,求大神解释下!!!
昨天收到论文回复,小修(之前经历过两次大修),给了如下意见,请虫友们帮忙解释下。
Comments from the Editors and Reviewers:
Please discuss the following paper on microarc oxidation and indicated in your letter how you have addressed the comments.
Nune KC, Misra RDK, Li SJ, Hao YL, Zhang W. 2016. The functional response of bioactive titania modified three-dimensional Ti-6Al-4V mesh structure toward providing a favorable pathway for intercellular communication and osteoincorporation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2016: DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35789
意思是给了一篇文献让我讨论然后把讨论的内容写在回复信中么?如果是的话,该如何讨论一篇文章呢?
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
喊你引用文献
引用作者的文献是大致确认了,不可能简单引用下就好了,大神们能重点讲下下一步该如何讨论么?就像7楼那样,不胜感激,