energy policy 一审大修,审稿人提的意见我看不很懂,求大神指教。
因为专业不是从事能源政策类研究的,虽然看过几篇文章,但是很多东西不懂。给了30天修改,就1个人审稿人意见,最后一条还是鼓励重写,压力山大。
审稿意见如下:
1. The paper needs a framework to address the major issues
框架是指的是什么?
2. In the introduction, we need to set an action plan with coal reserve under changing energy-mix environment in China
设置煤炭储量的行动计划是什么意思?我文中分析了煤炭储量。
3. Section 4 and 5 are relevant for the readers of this journal. Here we need to have a clear policy prescriptions identifying the historical trend with future prospects
清晰的政策处方识别历史趋势和未来前景?政策处方和历史趋势、未来前景之间的关系怎么体现?
4. I encourage the authors to rewrite this manuscript aiming at the following issues:
Why does this research topic is interesting for China in context of overall energy scenario? Identify historical and future trends, various technology and policy relevance of your findings should be discussed in detail.@Monash2011
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
那就按照那个审稿意见大修!修完再投,不行就可以改投其他期刊。
我是有点不明白修改意见的意思,修改也得尽最大努力不是?希望有高手指点下。
个人理解第一点是说文章重点不明确,结构需要优化
其他意见较为专业,俺就不班门弄斧大言不惭了
我也是搞自然科学的,社会科学方面搞不清。不过您能提出宝贵意见,肯定对我大有裨益的
,