当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >IEEE TSP这种意见是重新投一个新的还是修改的呢

IEEE TSP这种意见是重新投一个新的还是修改的呢

作者 peng_gq
来源: 小木虫 400 8 举报帖子
+关注

第一次投这个期刊,大家帮忙看一下这种情况是应该重新投一个还是投一个修改的附带审稿人问题的回答?
谢谢!
I am writing to you concerning the above referenced manuscript, which you submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

Based on the enclosed set of reviews, I regret to inform you that your manuscript has been rejected for publication (**See note below about attachments).

The reviewers pointed out several critical issues that need to been solved before your article could be considered adequate for publication in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. Taking into account all these aspects requires substantial modifications of your work, such that I recommend a new submission of your article after a deep revision in the case this article has not been submitted to this journal before.

Below I list the crucial aspects that require a thorough revision:

...........

I am sorry I do not have more positive news, because I do appreciate your consideration of the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing for publication of your work.
I hope that this decision will not discourage you from submitting your work to us in the future and instead this review process can help you in improving the quality of your work for a potential new submission.

Please note that according to IEEE Signal Processing Society policy "Handling of Rejected Papers" (https://www.signalprocessingsociety.org/about/governance/policy-procedure/part-2/), the Society strongly discourages resubmission of rejected manuscripts more than once. Authors should carefully review the aforementioned policy before resubmitting their manuscript. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 图像猫

    没有意见呀

  • gayi

    tsp最近好狠    我审了一篇fellow一作的论文    四个大修    创新性打分比较高    竟然也是直接拒稿

  • paperhunter

    如果楼主能够令人信服地回答审稿人提出的问题并且修改到位,就重投,否则还是改投为好。

  • peng_gq

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by gayi at 2016-05-09 13:03:58
    tsp最近好狠    我审了一篇fellow一作的论文    四个大修    创新性打分比较高    竟然也是直接拒稿

    第一次投这个期刊。。。这么狠啊?!那要不要改投其他的啊。。。

  • peng_gq

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by 图像猫 at 2016-05-09 12:47:15
    没有意见呀

    意见非常多,都是总结审稿人的一些话,就没贴出来了

  • peng_gq

    引用回帖:
    4楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-05-09 14:04:45
    如果楼主能够令人信服地回答审稿人提出的问题并且修改到位,就重投,否则还是改投为好。

    重投是指投一个带红色标注修改版并且附带回答问题的对吧?
    改投是重新提交一个新的还是投其他期刊呢

  • paperhunter

    引用回帖:
    7楼: Originally posted by peng_gq at 2016-05-09 14:19:49
    重投是指投一个带红色标注修改版并且附带回答问题的对吧?
    改投是重新提交一个新的还是投其他期刊呢...

    这里说的重投是修改后作为一个新稿件提交,在cover letter中说明以前投过稿,给出稿件编号,再点对点列出审稿意见和回复,说明做了哪些修改。
    改投是投期刊期刊

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓