24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2136  |  回复: 8

peng_gq

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] IEEE TSP这种意见是重新投一个新的还是修改的呢 已有1人参与

第一次投这个期刊,大家帮忙看一下这种情况是应该重新投一个还是投一个修改的附带审稿人问题的回答?
谢谢!
I am writing to you concerning the above referenced manuscript, which you submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

Based on the enclosed set of reviews, I regret to inform you that your manuscript has been rejected for publication (**See note below about attachments).

The reviewers pointed out several critical issues that need to been solved before your article could be considered adequate for publication in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. Taking into account all these aspects requires substantial modifications of your work, such that I recommend a new submission of your article after a deep revision in the case this article has not been submitted to this journal before.

Below I list the crucial aspects that require a thorough revision:

...........

I am sorry I do not have more positive news, because I do appreciate your consideration of the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing for publication of your work.
I hope that this decision will not discourage you from submitting your work to us in the future and instead this review process can help you in improving the quality of your work for a potential new submission.

Please note that according to IEEE Signal Processing Society policy "Handling of Rejected Papers" (https://www.signalprocessingsociety.org/about/governance/policy-procedure/part-2/), the Society strongly discourages resubmission of rejected manuscripts more than once. Authors should carefully review the aforementioned policy before resubmitting their manuscript.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

图像猫

新虫 (知名作家)

2楼2016-05-09 12:47:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gayi

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

tsp最近好狠    我审了一篇fellow一作的论文    四个大修    创新性打分比较高    竟然也是直接拒稿

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2016-05-09 13:03:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
如果楼主能够令人信服地回答审稿人提出的问题并且修改到位,就重投,否则还是改投为好。
咱也是有组织的人了...
4楼2016-05-09 14:04:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peng_gq

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by gayi at 2016-05-09 13:03:58
tsp最近好狠    我审了一篇fellow一作的论文    四个大修    创新性打分比较高    竟然也是直接拒稿

第一次投这个期刊。。。这么狠啊?!那要不要改投其他的啊。。。
5楼2016-05-09 14:17:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peng_gq

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 图像猫 at 2016-05-09 12:47:15
没有意见呀

意见非常多,都是总结审稿人的一些话,就没贴出来了
6楼2016-05-09 14:18:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peng_gq

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-05-09 14:04:45
如果楼主能够令人信服地回答审稿人提出的问题并且修改到位,就重投,否则还是改投为好。

重投是指投一个带红色标注修改版并且附带回答问题的对吧?
改投是重新提交一个新的还是投其他期刊呢
7楼2016-05-09 14:19:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
peng_gq: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案, 谢谢 2016-05-11 11:16:40
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by peng_gq at 2016-05-09 14:19:49
重投是指投一个带红色标注修改版并且附带回答问题的对吧?
改投是重新提交一个新的还是投其他期刊呢...

这里说的重投是修改后作为一个新稿件提交,在cover letter中说明以前投过稿,给出稿件编号,再点对点列出审稿意见和回复,说明做了哪些修改。
改投是投期刊期刊。
咱也是有组织的人了...
8楼2016-05-09 14:25:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

钻木取火

银虫 (正式写手)

楼主一审审了多久?
9楼2016-11-02 19:33:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 peng_gq 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见