最近投一篇jacs被拒，副主编建议可以重投，审稿人2个大修后再考虑1个直接接受。不知道重投过去的希望，会不会送到同样的审稿人手里。还望过来人帮着掂量一下。
副主编的原话是“ If you can fully address all of the issues raised by the reviewers, then I would be happy to consider a revised manuscript for publication as a Communication in JACS.”
Reviewer: 1  Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.
Reviewer: 2  Recommendation: Publish in JACS without change.
Reviewer: 3  Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.
不清楚是不是每个大修要求里都有“Other than this issue, it is my opinion that this is a very nice piece of work that could be suitable for publication in JACS once this issue is addressed.”这么一种表述。原稿中有段话吹的太狠了，两个审稿人都提出了异议，第一个审稿人建议删掉并加很多其他地方的修改建议，第三个审稿人对这段也提出了异议然后没有任何其他的修改意见。。
出篇文章不容易，还望过来人指点一下，这篇文章中的可能性。 返回小木虫查看更多