JACS被拒，但副主编建议可以重投，过来人给个建议
最近投一篇jacs被拒，副主编建议可以重投，审稿人2个大修后再考虑1个直接接受。不知道重投过去的希望，会不会送到同样的审稿人手里。还望过来人帮着掂量一下。
副主编的原话是“ If you can fully address all of the issues raised by the reviewers, then I would be happy to consider a revised manuscript for publication as a Communication in JACS.”
Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.
Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Publish in JACS without change.
Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions.
不清楚是不是每个大修要求里都有“Other than this issue, it is my opinion that this is a very nice piece of work that could be suitable for publication in JACS once this issue is addressed.”这么一种表述。原稿中有段话吹的太狠了，两个审稿人都提出了异议，第一个审稿人建议删掉并加很多其他地方的修改建议，第三个审稿人对这段也提出了异议然后没有任何其他的修改意见。。
出篇文章不容易，还望过来人指点一下，这篇文章中的可能性。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
你都投JACS了，我还能说什么，祝好
这......是什么意思？还望指点，毕竟这是我第一篇类似的文章，毫无经验
，
Its very clear that only the issues mentioned by the 2 viewers need to be addressed before sending it out once again. Your opinin is kinda correct. Do what they want you to do and send it out afterwards to see what will happen. Prepare for minor revision. Good luck.
resubmit的话，编辑会将你的文章转给原审稿人。其实重投跟大修差不多
JACS的话，我建议你好好修改再投回去，祝好！
而且从意见上来看，基本是偏正面的，加油！
祝福
实际上等同大修啊~