如何委婉地回复审稿人的拒稿意见
投的化工类. 二审三个审稿人。一个小修，一个通过，一个建议大修甚至拒稿。是这么说的：
I have read the revision to the manuscript entitled "xxx". My general impression is that the work remains a potentially valuable contribution to your journal, but also that it is not yet ready for publication. In my previous review report, I gave the authors the general suggestion to take more care in preparing their manuscript, and I did not expect to receive their revision after only three weeks. Unfortunately, the authors did not provide adequate improvement of their work, which should come as no surprise after such a short turnaround time. I will have to maintain my recommendation for major revision, though I would advise the authors to retract their submission and resubmit only after substantial gain in quantity and quality of their work.
但我认为我的研究是完整的而且可以发表，其他两个审稿人也没有意见。
请问该怎么委婉的反驳他？希望大家能给一些句式，模板之类的建议？这是他的第一个点，后面还有很多技术上的我都回复并且修改了。
太谢谢了！
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
他有提什么修改意见吗，还是只是笼统地给你几句话，让你们修改。
I did not expect to receive their revision after only three weeks
这句很关键。觉得你回复的太快了。没有按照审稿专家的意见和建议做细致全面的修改。
他给了好多挺多修改意见，大概十条左右。我们都改了，就是这段不知道该不该回复。
不好意思前段时间上不来小木虫了。请问我应该怎么回复呢？说我这次认真仔细的修改过了？
I will have to maintain my recommendation for major revision, though I would advise the authors to retract their submission and resubmit only after substantial gain in quantity and quality of their work.
这个审稿人本想让你撤稿，并重新提交，并且需要在数量和质量上有重大的提高，但是最后还是决定给你一次大修机会。
你要point-to-point 的回复，不能敷衍，绕圈子的回复。实在没法改的，说清楚原因。说清楚这次重大的提高在哪里
，