当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >RSC advances 审稿意见返回,有一条不是很懂,望大家指点

RSC advances 审稿意见返回,有一条不是很懂,望大家指点

作者 15170078114
来源: 小木虫 700 14 举报帖子
+关注

今天 RSC advances 审稿意见返回,其中有一条不是很明白,望大家指点指点
Experimental and uncertainties:
No information is given about the number of replicates and the confidence of the experiments. Please provide it. All experimental plots are provided without errors bars. Please add uncertainties.
Kinetic study:
Why didn’t you remove or replicate the measure at 20 minutes on Figure 7. Could you give the numerical value of ka and perhaps compare it with the literature? 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 国际科学编辑

    No information is given about the number of replicates and the confidence of the experiments. Please provide it 让你补充实验重复次数。
    All experimental plots are provided without errors bars. Please add uncertainties. 图片里面增加标准误
    Kinetic study:
    Why didn’t you remove or replicate the measure at 20 minutes on Figure 7. Could you give the numerical value of ka and perhaps compare it with the literature?
    图7里面20分钟时的检测为嘛没有删除或重复? 提供Ka值,并与既往研究得到的结果进行比较,

  • songzijian

    没画error bars吧

  • 15170078114

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by songzijian at 2016-03-22 16:19:25
    没画error bars吧

    没有画,这个怎么画

  • songzijian

    内容已删除

  • linchengqi

    添加误差线,origin等就可以做,另外要补充误差分析,质量控制等相关描述

  • 可淡不可忘

    实验重复次数和误差棒没有!

  • 15170078114

    引用回帖:
    7楼: Originally posted by 可淡不可忘 at 2016-03-27 15:53:28
    实验重复次数和误差棒没有!

    那如果我只做了两次怎么办,是不是有点少

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓