最近投稿了一篇文章，杂志回复说“The editor has reviewed the decision and confirmed that, although the paper describes a method for adjusting the suspension of a locomotive which is clearly very effective it is not based on particularly innovative scientific methods and is therefore not suitable for publication in an academic journal”
请问各位虫友，文章中明明提出了原创性的理论和模型，为什么还会收到这么定性的评论？这是说我对研究对象采用的分析方法或者所建模型不新颖，还是求解过程中用的算法啥的不够高端？ 投了两家了，都是没有给出具体的意见或建议，很是郁闷。
再就是后来编辑又给推荐了SAGE旗下一个开源期刊，可以直接投稿，请问这样录用的概率会大一些吗？ 返回小木虫查看更多