小博当时没在意，结果投了一篇SCI的special issue 现在返回来大修意见，三个审稿人一致认为我的英语 very poor。还好没有补充实验，就是语法问题和个别变量解释。其中一个编辑让我和他的两篇文章对比，因为他和研究的不是完全一样，只是一个大类相似，也没法做实验对比。是不是就在相关工作中说一下，引用这个俩个文献。
下面是总编发的意见：
I have received three reviews on your submission to JETC.  The reviewers are in general agreement that the paper should undergo major revisions before it can be considered for publication in JETC.  Detailed comments from the reviewers are appended to the end of this email.
Also upload your Revision Comments (in pdf or ps) that detail the changes you made to your paper in response to reviewers' comments.  Both should be tagged as Files for review.  Your revision is due within four weeks.
Your revised paper and comments will reviewed by your paper's original reviewers to see if their concerns have been addressed.
大家帮忙看看可能性大不 返回小木虫查看更多