审稿意见如下：
Comments:
The manuscript has been much improved. Now I also understandd Figs. 4, 6 and 8 better. But I'm a little bit worried about the fitting quality of Figs. 4, 6 and 8. Frankly speaking, they are really poor (not at publication level). I quickly checked the literature, some paper used a general Gamma distribution to represent the dropsize distribution. Should authors change their fitting function here? Please answer.


审稿人一开始说拟合质量太差，我用的normal fitting, 查了一下文献中多数用lognormal，审稿人让用gamma distribution去表现液滴尺寸分布，我在这里有点搞不懂了，究竟是拟合质量的问题，还是用的分布方式不对？审稿人是说的几个问题，一个还是两个？晕了。。。。。。文章已经修改两个了，编辑说这是最后一次修改机会。The reviewers still have serious concerns about your manuscript and with serious comments on a revision i usually reject the paper. However, I decided to give you one last chance at bringing it up to the level it passes the reviewers.



Fig. 4. The droplet size distribution of the heavy crude oil/brine emulsions under 55 oC,100 oC,150 oC (PVT) after 15 days separation. The solid line in the histogram graph represents a normal fitting curve. 是乳状液显微图片数据化，用软件统计液滴尺寸，用origin直接作出histogram图，直接点击图形拟合。

我是简单修改一下拟合方式就行，比如从normal 改成lognormal或者gamma， 还是改变x轴，变成gamma distribution， 然后再拟合呢？ 求助，求助。


4.jpg



3.jpg 返回小木虫查看更多