|
|
[求助]
审稿意见求助,拟合方面
审稿意见如下:
Comments:
The manuscript has been much improved. Now I also understandd Figs. 4, 6 and 8 better. But I'm a little bit worried about the fitting quality of Figs. 4, 6 and 8. Frankly speaking, they are really poor (not at publication level). I quickly checked the literature, some paper used a general Gamma distribution to represent the dropsize distribution. Should authors change their fitting function here? Please answer.
审稿人一开始说拟合质量太差,我用的normal fitting, 查了一下文献中多数用lognormal,审稿人让用gamma distribution去表现液滴尺寸分布,我在这里有点搞不懂了,究竟是拟合质量的问题,还是用的分布方式不对?审稿人是说的几个问题,一个还是两个?晕了。。。。。。文章已经修改两个了,编辑说这是最后一次修改机会。The reviewers still have serious concerns about your manuscript and with serious comments on a revision i usually reject the paper. However, I decided to give you one last chance at bringing it up to the level it passes the reviewers.
Fig. 4. The droplet size distribution of the heavy crude oil/brine emulsions under 55 oC,100 oC,150 oC (PVT) after 15 days separation. The solid line in the histogram graph represents a normal fitting curve. 是乳状液显微图片数据化,用软件统计液滴尺寸,用origin直接作出histogram图,直接点击图形拟合。
我是简单修改一下拟合方式就行,比如从normal 改成lognormal或者gamma, 还是改变x轴,变成gamma distribution, 然后再拟合呢? 求助,求助。
![审稿意见求助,拟合方面]()
4.jpg
![审稿意见求助,拟合方面-1]()
3.jpg |
» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
|