投ACS AMI编辑给的如下意见，中的概率大不大？
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis, assuming no related data is published in the interim. We ask that you submit your revision by 06-Aug-2016. This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.
这是编辑给的意见，4个审稿人，两个小修，两个拒了，编辑看样子让重投，投中的概率大不大？
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
好好修改，应该还是很有希望的，祝福
好好修改，中的几率很大！
跟我去年的ACS AMI一模一样，编辑说了一大推，都是套话，就一个意思，就目前的状态不能接收，但是对本文的idea还是比较赞成，所以给了据稿重投，期限大概是180天。好好改，我看好这篇文章，按要求改绝对能接收。千万不能马虎，该改的一定要到位，不能改的说明理由，以理据争。
好好回答问题 可以接受的~
祝好运~
，
楼主运气不错，一般像你这种审稿意见，ACS AMI是肯定拒稿的，但显然编辑欣赏你的文章并且给你这个宝贵的修改机会，好好珍惜吧，尽量满足审稿人的意见，希望还是挺大的。
编辑偏向于你，仔细修改，应该没问题的