投ACS AMI编辑给的如下意见,中的概率大不大?
Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that included such data and analysis, assuming no related data is published in the interim. We ask that you submit your revision by 06-Aug-2016. This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.
这是编辑给的意见,4个审稿人,两个小修,两个拒了,编辑看样子让重投,投中的概率大不大?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
自己顶,第一次投文章,希望大家多给些意见
关键在于你能不能回答审稿人的问题。4个2拒一般都是拒的,既然编辑没拒,就是喜欢你的工作。这杂志很重视审稿人的意见,我当时就一个小问题,我回复后,审稿人不满意,结果就这一问题来回修了4次才接受。如过你能补充数据,即使不能,也能找到很充分的理由反驳,那其实中的概率很大。如果不行,那还是投其它的。
,
抓紧好好修改。有希望
楼上说的很好,祝福