当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >第一次投稿SCI,悲剧了,求前辈们帮忙分析

第一次投稿SCI,悲剧了,求前辈们帮忙分析

作者 zhangpip
来源: 小木虫 3100 62 举报帖子
+关注

投了一篇information sciences,15天后editor in chief 回信建议改投他刊,然后给了一些commens


Our Editor-in-Chief, Professor W. P, has now carefully considered your paper, and we would like to encourage you to consider submitting your paper to some other journal that will be more suited to broadly disseminate your research results.

For your guidance, please find his comments below.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Editor's comments:



Editor's comments:

AE: The paper proposes A multi-swarm adaptive particle swarm optimization with dynamic task allocation. Since the emphasis is on new method, the paper fails to justify the outperforming points of the new method. The paper is written with so many things together that one really is lost while understanding the motivation to take up the current study. The paper needs to be rewritten. The long list of experimental results along with some trivial graphical representations do not generate much interest as the discussion section is too weak. What about the extensions of the proposed method to constrained optimization problem ? The paper has lots of language related error.

不知道该怎么修改,也不知还能不能再投此刊,另外,主编最后说了一句论文中有语法错误,是不是必须进行润色呢?求经验人士给点建议!

大过年的,祝各位新年快乐!



[ Last edited by zhangpip on 2016-2-5 at 13:06 ] 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • wanguoqiang

    修改后再投此刊是可以的,润色是必须的

  • BDWLBR

    .

  • bjc1987

    多看别人怎么写的,写作技巧多学别人的,另外文章安排和语法错误多的话,我都是直接拒

  • aye_aye

    给意见了就有要的意思,好好改吧,祝好运

  • guoxg701

    这个期刊不能再投了,好好润色一下,抓住重点,对于与主题关联性较少的部分直接删除。一篇文章能解决或理解1-2个问题就可以了,不需要面面俱到。仅供参考!

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓