编辑给的是大修，其中一个审稿人的意见比较好懂，也容易修改。但是这个审稿人的意见应该是负面的，给了3条意见，不知道是让我大修还是直接拒稿的意思。各位有经验的虫友帮忙分析一下，按照他的意见逐条回复还有戏么？
Reviewer #1: The *** is an interesting issue for engineering applications. However, I think the innovation is insufficient for publication. The author should consider the following issues.
1. According to my understanding,the nonlinear vibration control requires the nonlinear dynamic equation of structures. But the linearized model of cable net structure is used in this paper.
2. Section 2 needs a greatly simplification because the context is traditional or the work of other authors.
3. The model reduction is important issues for the vibration control of cable net structures. It is not considered in this paper. 返回小木虫查看更多