之前投的一个sci修后重投被拒了。。。继续改投，现在审稿意见下来了，只有一个审稿人意见，而且意见也只有三条，然后编辑给了两个星期revise,这个到底算是大修还是小修了。。。。关键只有一个审稿人，要不要发信问问编辑是不是漏了。
Please find the review results for your paper at the address attached below, and make the modifications according to the reviewers'
opinion.Please highlight or type in red where you have corrected. Your revised manuscript will be sent to the reviewers again for the
reconsideration.
Please submit the revised manuscript in two weeks (till January 11,
2016) from the website:
At the top of the cover letter, please mark on the tracking number:
xx and write down a point-by-point response to the reviews.

We are looking forward to receiving your revised paper.

REVIEWER 1
This paper mentioned design and optimization of XX.
The design is useful for XX developer. But I am not sure that this
paper have novelty or originality.
For example:
1. What is advantage or novelty using DE algorithm to this analysis?
2. Why decreased cogging torque by using XX?
3. How to do select the optimization variables?
Please explain about above comment. 返回小木虫查看更多