投稿指南里的，谁能告诉我是什么意思？
Putting research into context
·From Jan 1, 2015, all research papers (apart from meta-analyses) submitted to any journal in The Lancet family must include a panel putting their research into context with previous work, with an enhanced structure and subheadings compared with papers submitted before this date (see Lancet2014; 384: 2176–77, and panel below for guidance). This panel should not contain references. Editors will use this information at the first assessment stage and peer reviewers will be specifically asked to check the content and accuracy
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
？
我理解是把你以前的成果汇总，但不是参考文献形式，便于编辑掌握你研究内容的准确性
提供专家组信息？
谁懂？能给我讲明白的我给100块钱
？
？
2015以后的论文，要发表柳叶刀旗下期刊，除了有关meta-analyses方面的呢，必须要有Research in context这么一块，介绍一下以前的工作，以及怎么和现在研究联系起来，有什么创新之类的，这一块跟以前格式不同了，按下面的来
像https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/authors/lancet-information-for-authors.pdf中写的
Research in context 主标题
Evidence before this study 副标题
This section should include a description of all the evidence that the authors considered before undertaking this study. Authors should state: the sources (databases, journal or book reference lists, etc) searched; the criteria used to include or exclude studies (including the exact start and end dates of the search), which should not be limited to English language publications; the search terms used; the quality (risk of bias) of that evidence; and the pooled estimate derived from meta-analysis of the evidence, if appropriate.
Added value of this study副标题
Authors should describe here how their findings add value to the existing evidence (including an updated meta-analysis, if appropriate).
Implications of all the available evidence副标题
Authors should state the implications for practice or policy and future research of their study combined with existing evidence.
这一块引用什么的就不用加了，第一阶段评审和同行评审大家要用这个来判断你研究的价值和可信度，就这样，