| 查看: 1639 | 回复: 14 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者0秋日私语将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
[求助]
投稿指南里的，谁能告诉我是什么意思？ 已有2人参与
|
||
|
Putting research into context ·From Jan 1, 2015, all research papers (apart from meta-analyses) submitted to any journal in The Lancet family must include a panel putting their research into context with previous work, with an enhanced structure and subheadings compared with papers submitted before this date (see Lancet2014; 384: 2176–77, and panel below for guidance). This panel should not contain references. Editors will use this information at the first assessment stage and peer reviewers will be specifically asked to check the content and accuracy 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上项目没有好文章就没希望了吗？
已经有14人回复
-
困死了
已经有8人回复
-
不知道还有没有招博士的学校了
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
材料博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
还有课题组有博士名额吗
已经有6人回复
-
关于水星近日点进动成因的质疑 与实证分析
已经有10人回复
-
博士申请
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
2楼2015-12-18 20:12:46
tara1987
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1102.8
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 625
- 在线: 42.8小时
- 虫号: 1107299
- 注册: 2010-09-25
- 专业: 图书馆、情报与文献学其他
3楼2015-12-19 08:11:22
tara1987
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1102.8
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 625
- 在线: 42.8小时
- 虫号: 1107299
- 注册: 2010-09-25
- 专业: 图书馆、情报与文献学其他
4楼2015-12-19 08:16:19
5楼2015-12-19 16:00:19
6楼2015-12-19 16:27:31
7楼2015-12-19 17:02:55
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
2015以后的论文，要发表柳叶刀旗下期刊，除了有关meta-analyses方面的呢，必须要有Research in context这么一块，介绍一下以前的工作，以及怎么和现在研究联系起来，有什么创新之类的，这一块跟以前格式不同了，按下面的来 像https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet/authors/lancet-information-for-authors.pdf中写的 Research in context 主标题 Evidence before this study 副标题 This section should include a description of all the evidence that the authors considered before undertaking this study. Authors should state: the sources (databases, journal or book reference lists, etc) searched; the criteria used to include or exclude studies (including the exact start and end dates of the search), which should not be limited to English language publications; the search terms used; the quality (risk of bias) of that evidence; and the pooled estimate derived from meta-analysis of the evidence, if appropriate. Added value of this study副标题 Authors should describe here how their findings add value to the existing evidence (including an updated meta-analysis, if appropriate). Implications of all the available evidence副标题 Authors should state the implications for practice or policy and future research of their study combined with existing evidence. 这一块引用什么的就不用加了，第一阶段评审和同行评审大家要用这个来判断你研究的价值和可信度，就这样 |
8楼2015-12-19 23:00:08
9楼2015-12-19 23:51:25
10楼2015-12-20 01:59:11