如此 论文一审被判了 Reject & Resubmit ；最大的争议是 两个审稿人要求呈现中西两国比较研究的结果
由于 本论文做的只是一个中国的案例研究，因此修改过程中 就突出强调案例研究的特点是呈现中国情境的东西，而中西比较 最好是由 比较研究来完成。
因此，我选择如下这样回复 主编。
Case studies are useful to enable researchers to gain an understanding of the complexities of that particular context and to preserve a sense of the ‘wholeness’ of the site being investigated (Punch, 1998).  Cross-case analysis were undertaken to identify common themes evident across the informants, and also importantly to identify differences, within and between the informants. However, there is no intention to celebrate, contrast and compare the Chinese context with the Anglophone perspective on XXX, which may possibly be more appropriate to the comparative study between Chinese cases and Anglophone cases. But readers are invited to reflect on the emergent themes and to make their own judgments about potential transferability to their contexts. Thus, the most substantial revision we have made focused on providing the thick descriptions of XXX in the specific Chinese context.

我想请问在这样的情况下，即并没有 通过按着俩审稿人的思路 进一步去深挖中西差异的修改方式，还有必要 point-by-point 的去回复审稿人吗？ 返回小木虫查看更多