被scripta拒稿了,回复说我的工作很有用,想投其他期刊,大家给点意见。
主编的意见如下:
We have completed a preliminary assessment of your submission. The work is useful, but it is essentially a routine microstructural characterisation and does not reveal significantly novel phenomena.
Scripta Materialia publishes a limited number of papers which we believe are of generic interest to the readers of the journal, and which are likely to represent significant advances in the field.
While your submission may be of a high quality, we unfortunately do not feel that it is appropriate for Scripta and recommend that you send it to another journal where it may have a greater impact.
Thank you for giving us the chance to consider your submission.
应该是说我写的东西是个常规的组织转变,不适合scripta,但是我的工作是有用的,因为写的东西有些创新性,但是我感觉创新性不太足。大家给点意见,如果对待编辑的回复?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
不要想太多,只是正常的回复而已,客套话,换刊继续投吧
客套话,言下之意是创新性还没有达到该期刊要求
婉拒了,还是改投合适的期刊吧
很正常,换期刊就行了
改投吧
创新性强但表征不是很全面的建议投Scripta或Letters类;创新不突出但表征分析全面的建议投full length article.
我赞成楼上的意见。
letter对创新性要求很高。
full length article更着重数据的完整性、工作的系统性。Acta除外,一般的JAC、MSEA、JMS之类的都可以试试
,
祝好