被scripta拒稿了,回复说我的工作很有用,想投其他期刊,大家给点意见。
主编的意见如下:
We have completed a preliminary assessment of your submission. The work is useful, but it is essentially a routine microstructural characterisation and does not reveal significantly novel phenomena.
Scripta Materialia publishes a limited number of papers which we believe are of generic interest to the readers of the journal, and which are likely to represent significant advances in the field.
While your submission may be of a high quality, we unfortunately do not feel that it is appropriate for Scripta and recommend that you send it to another journal where it may have a greater impact.
Thank you for giving us the chance to consider your submission.
应该是说我写的东西是个常规的组织转变,不适合scripta,但是我的工作是有用的,因为写的东西有些创新性,但是我感觉创新性不太足。大家给点意见,如果对待编辑的回复?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
很正常的拒稿信,不用多想了,改投mater lett或者JAC吧
很正常的拒稿信,不用多想了,改投mater lett或者JAC吧
外国人的客套话,不要多想。就像他们说“你很漂亮”是客气,不用想象那儿漂亮
主编说你的工作只是常规的微结构表征,没有揭示出新现象,普通的拒稿信。你必须说明这些微结构和其它现象/性质的关系,要往前再走一步才行。
谢谢,但是我估计我的分析已经够了,可能是我做的东西之前就已经出现过,编辑感觉创新性不足吧
,
谢谢啊,我改改试试投letter
我的第一反应也是投letter呢。祝福楼主加油↖(^ω^)↗。