如题 投稿本专业内top 10%d的SSCI 期刊，第一轮reviewz之后的decision 如下
I regret to inform you that the referees have raised serious concerns, and therefore your paper cannot be accepted for publication in  XXX . However since the referees do find some merit in the paper, I would be willing to reconsider if you wish to undertake major revisions and re-submit, addressing the referees' concerns.
我想请问这种情况跟直接给大修有啥区别呢？前者机会渺茫，法外开恩的意思吗？  仔细阅读了两个审稿人14条意见之后 发现出了一条是大问题之外，其它基本都是小问题呀？有信心可以改好除了那一条之外的其它所有意见。 可是 为啥直接就给拒了呢？
麻烦请晓得情况的虫友给指点一二？ 感谢！ 返回小木虫查看更多