哪位大神可以帮我解释一下这两个审稿人的意见是什么意思,我还有修改的必要么
小妹第一次投外文,在此不胜感谢
第一个:However, the manuscript is poorly written and it is quite difficult to measure the performance of these absorbents due to lack of the detailed analysis and control experiments. Unless the authors reorganize the data and conduct more experiments, this manuscript is not suitable for the publication in RSC Advances.
第二个:this work is useful for desulfurization from flue gas, which could be considered for publication in RSC Advance after the following points were fully addressed.
谢谢大家谢谢大家
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
认真回答审稿人的问题,即使不被接受,以后再改投,中的可能也会大一些
恩恩,那我认真改改,谢谢啦
,
谢谢,有信心多啦
谢谢,有信心多啦
可以修改 应该能接受