当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >哪位大神可以帮我解释一下这两个审稿人的意见是什么意思,我还有修改的必要么

哪位大神可以帮我解释一下这两个审稿人的意见是什么意思,我还有修改的必要么

作者 bowen333
来源: 小木虫 600 12 举报帖子
+关注

小妹第一次投外文,在此不胜感谢
第一个:However, the manuscript is poorly written and it is quite difficult to measure the performance of these absorbents due to lack of the detailed analysis and control experiments. Unless the authors reorganize the data and conduct more experiments, this manuscript is not suitable for the publication in RSC Advances.
第二个:this work is useful for desulfurization from flue gas, which could be considered for publication in RSC Advance after the following points were fully addressed.
谢谢大家谢谢大家 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • Leosunmy

    认真回答审稿人的问题,即使不被接受,以后再改投,中的可能也会大一些

  • bowen333

    引用回帖:
    7楼: Originally posted by ltzhangxjtu at 2015-10-08 13:09:00
    编辑会找第三个审稿人,这个意见就很重要了,我当时是第三个同意,修改稿就直接接受了

    恩恩,那我认真改改,谢谢啦

  • bowen333

    引用回帖:
    9楼: Originally posted by Leosunmy at 2015-10-08 16:14:12
    认真回答审稿人的问题,即使不被接受,以后再改投,中的可能也会大一些

    谢谢,有信心多啦

  • bowen333

    引用回帖:
    8楼: Originally posted by chenzhen0725 at 2015-10-08 14:37:59
    只要认真回答审稿人的问题,接受率很大,这是经验之谈

    谢谢,有信心多啦

  • 上杉达也

    可以修改  应该能接受

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓