当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >电分析化学投稿,如何回复审稿意见——为什么用铁氰化钾做探针——跪求回复

电分析化学投稿,如何回复审稿意见——为什么用铁氰化钾做探针——跪求回复

作者 曼鱼0429
来源: 小木虫 550 11 举报帖子
+关注

投稿JSSE,审稿人回复的意见没看太懂,跪求解释,我是科研上的失败者,请大家赐教
IV) The electrochemical characterization of the nanocomposite uses routine CV (Figure 1) and EIS experiments (Figure 2) with Fe(CN)63-/Fe(CN)64- as a redox probe. In this regard:

a) The use of a redox probe different from the analyte, although widely used in the literature, has a limited validity. See Seeber et al. Functional Materials in Amperometric Sensing, Springer, 2014.(这本书要两千多美元,太贵,买不起……)

b) The authors provide a series of values attributed to the charge transfer resistance in the text in page 7. These values are provided with an unrealistic number of significant figures if replicate experiments are used and have only a definite meaning if the experimental EIS data are fitted to a concrete equivalent circuit.(完全没看懂是啥意思)
 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 曼鱼0429

    引用回帖:
    8楼: Originally posted by cqzhangzhang at 2015-08-28 14:00:33
    其实编辑关心两个问题。第一个,贴氰化钾作为电子介质,纳米材料和修饰的蛋白对其作用是复杂的,不确定的。第二个,你每次修饰的纳米材料或蛋白量是不确定的。这种变异程度是很大的。你就这两点回答就可以了。实事 ...

    固体电化学,我是先滴涂碳纳米管再聚合的氨基酸。说实话,我还是不知道该怎样回答,太笨了

  • xj787133830

    我最近也遇到了这个问题,想请教下lz当时是怎么回答“a) The use of a redox probe different from the analyte, although widely used in the literature, has a limited validity. See Seeber et al. Functional Materials in Amperometric Sensing, Springer, 2014.”这个问题的啊?好捉急~~~

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓