当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >投稿后编辑初审后直接拒搞(未送审),怎么破???!!!修改重投 ? 还是改投?

投稿后编辑初审后直接拒搞(未送审),怎么破???!!!修改重投 ? 还是改投?

作者 liliangqing
来源: 小木虫 700 14 举报帖子
+关注

投稿后编辑初审后直接拒搞(未送审),怎么破???!!!修改重投 ? 还是改投?

编辑回复
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. After my own initial comprehensive review, I must conclude that it remains unclear why this work is novel over prior work on exactly the same zeolite membranes. Hence I need to reject the manuscript at this stage already.

In order to support your efforts to formulate highly innovative and novel research, I would like to point you to a compilation of essays published by the American Chemical Society. This may help you to formulate the manuscripts such that novelty goes beyond a mere variation of a material system for instance.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.co ... %20publications.pdf

Also Elsevier offers two sources which are highly educational in terms of acceptance and rejections of papers:

Peter Thrower, Editor of Carbon
https://www.elsevier.com/connect ... jected-your-article

The response from other editors
https://www.elsevier.com/connect ... cepted-your-article

With kind regards 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • pjstang

    这个真心破不了。
    编辑已经是comprehensive review后的拒稿。
    而且,楼主实验室下次投这个期刊的时候还得注意创新性。

  • 阿Q~~

    blessing in next half year 2015 ! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • comen

    换个期刊

  • quan3145

    呵呵,拒稿一般要改投!

  • pjstang

    引用回帖:
    10楼: Originally posted by liliangqing at 2015-08-24 06:24:31
    之前投中了一篇CC,现在是换了应用体系。
    ...

    换个体系算不算创新?这个严格起来说不算大创新。除非你的这个新体系从本质属性而言与你之前CC文章里的体系是不同的。有时候一个材料确实能适用于通类似的多个体系。所以换个体系这个事,很难说。
    至少这次再编辑这里,他认真读文章了,但不买账

  • seanlee88

    改投吧

    Carbon要求创新性和科学性,这两个如果编辑不认可,无解

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓