投稿后编辑初审后直接拒搞(未送审),怎么破???!!!修改重投 ? 还是改投?
投稿后编辑初审后直接拒搞(未送审),怎么破???!!!修改重投 ? 还是改投?
编辑回复
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. After my own initial comprehensive review, I must conclude that it remains unclear why this work is novel over prior work on exactly the same zeolite membranes. Hence I need to reject the manuscript at this stage already.
In order to support your efforts to formulate highly innovative and novel research, I would like to point you to a compilation of essays published by the American Chemical Society. This may help you to formulate the manuscripts such that novelty goes beyond a mere variation of a material system for instance.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.co ... %20publications.pdf
Also Elsevier offers two sources which are highly educational in terms of acceptance and rejections of papers:
Peter Thrower, Editor of Carbon
https://www.elsevier.com/connect ... jected-your-article
The response from other editors
https://www.elsevier.com/connect ... cepted-your-article
With kind regards
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
这个真心破不了。
编辑已经是comprehensive review后的拒稿。
而且,楼主实验室下次投这个期刊的时候还得注意创新性。
blessing in next half year 2015 ! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
换个期刊
呵呵,拒稿一般要改投!
换个体系算不算创新?这个严格起来说不算大创新。除非你的这个新体系从本质属性而言与你之前CC文章里的体系是不同的。有时候一个材料确实能适用于通类似的多个体系。所以换个体系这个事,很难说。
至少这次再编辑这里,他认真读文章了,但不买账
,
改投吧
Carbon要求创新性和科学性,这两个如果编辑不认可,无解