当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >Catalysis Communication 拒稿

Catalysis Communication 拒稿

作者 jxgalyj
来源: 小木虫 650 13 举报帖子
+关注

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they have identified a number of problems with your work that are quite major.  Therefore I must reject it.  However, your paper does have merit.  Thus, if you consider carefully their comments, you may be able to make major changes/additions/revisions and present your work or provide new results in a way that would be more convincing.  If so, I would be happy to reconsider it as a new submission and get a completely new set of reviews by a different group of reviewers.
问题 :编辑已经拒稿,但是让修改重投,这种有没有重投的必要?另外,如果是重投的话要不要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及我的答复?谢谢。 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • xiaopang8958

    会看到的,因为你把审稿意见传上去了!

  • ldq5871

    就是大修,一样的,重投吧,cover letter 里写清楚

  • jxgalyj

    引用回帖:
    9楼: Originally posted by xiaopang8958 at 2015-08-25 21:49:16
    会看到的,因为你把审稿意见传上去了!

    由于我投的是Catalysis Communication,修改后发现图标总数及字数都超过了期刊的要求,是不是技术审查就通不过?

  • xiaopang8958

    是啊,communcation有字数和页数限制,所以要删的,或者把不太重要的放到支持信息里

  • jxgalyj

    引用回帖:
    6楼: Originally posted by xiaopang8958 at 2015-08-19 07:29:40
    楼主不用标注,因为是重投,只需要在回复信写明就行!
    ...

    楼主,您好,我这种情况在Cover letter 里面怎么说?如果要说明哪里修改了的话,不是要红色标记吗

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓