Catalysis Communication 拒稿
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they have identified a number of problems with your work that are quite major. Therefore I must reject it. However, your paper does have merit. Thus, if you consider carefully their comments, you may be able to make major changes/additions/revisions and present your work or provide new results in a way that would be more convincing. If so, I would be happy to reconsider it as a new submission and get a completely new set of reviews by a different group of reviewers.
问题 :编辑已经拒稿,但是让修改重投,这种有没有重投的必要?另外,如果是重投的话要不要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及我的答复?谢谢。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
会看到的,因为你把审稿意见传上去了!
就是大修,一样的,重投吧,cover letter 里写清楚
由于我投的是Catalysis Communication,修改后发现图标总数及字数都超过了期刊的要求,是不是技术审查就通不过?
是啊,communcation有字数和页数限制,所以要删的,或者把不太重要的放到支持信息里
楼主,您好,我这种情况在Cover letter 里面怎么说?如果要说明哪里修改了的话,不是要红色标记吗
,