Catalysis Communication 拒稿
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they have identified a number of problems with your work that are quite major. Therefore I must reject it. However, your paper does have merit. Thus, if you consider carefully their comments, you may be able to make major changes/additions/revisions and present your work or provide new results in a way that would be more convincing. If so, I would be happy to reconsider it as a new submission and get a completely new set of reviews by a different group of reviewers.
问题 :编辑已经拒稿,但是让修改重投,这种有没有重投的必要?另外,如果是重投的话要不要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及我的答复?谢谢。
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
如果还希望发表在该期刊,可以重投,重投的话要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及你的答复。
有必要啊其实这相当于大修,只要按照审稿人的意见修改重投肯定没问题!如果重投需要付上审稿意见和回复!祝好!
这相当于是大修啊,改改重投吧,编辑开恩没有具死你
谢谢楼主。
楼主如果我重投并附上审稿意见的话,编辑再找其他审稿人的话会看到先前审稿人的问题及我的回复吗
,