当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >Catalysis Communication 拒稿

Catalysis Communication 拒稿

作者 jxgalyj
来源: 小木虫 650 13 举报帖子
+关注

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they have identified a number of problems with your work that are quite major.  Therefore I must reject it.  However, your paper does have merit.  Thus, if you consider carefully their comments, you may be able to make major changes/additions/revisions and present your work or provide new results in a way that would be more convincing.  If so, I would be happy to reconsider it as a new submission and get a completely new set of reviews by a different group of reviewers.
问题 :编辑已经拒稿,但是让修改重投,这种有没有重投的必要?另外,如果是重投的话要不要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及我的答复?谢谢。 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • taikong

    如果还希望发表在该期刊,可以重投,重投的话要附上上次审稿人的审稿意见及你的答复。

  • xiaopang8958

    有必要啊其实这相当于大修,只要按照审稿人的意见修改重投肯定没问题!如果重投需要付上审稿意见和回复!祝好!

  • 小狮子2010

    这相当于是大修啊,改改重投吧,编辑开恩没有具死你

  • jxgalyj

    引用回帖:
    6楼: Originally posted by xiaopang8958 at 2015-08-19 07:29:40
    楼主不用标注,因为是重投,只需要在回复信写明就行!
    ...

    谢谢楼主。

  • jxgalyj

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by xiaopang8958 at 2015-08-18 22:36:43
    有必要啊其实这相当于大修,只要按照审稿人的意见修改重投肯定没问题!如果重投需要付上审稿意见和回复!祝好!

    楼主如果我重投并附上审稿意见的话,编辑再找其他审稿人的话会看到先前审稿人的问题及我的回复吗

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓