求教下大家这个一审后的结果是怎么回事？一审给的是Revise，二审还是revise，没有major和minor之分么？
Reviewer #1: I am happy that authors have considered all the comments in a positive way and have modified the manuscript accordingly. The manuscript is now OK for me.

just suggest authors carefully check English presentation of this paper. Ask a professional to proofread if possible.

Reviewer #2: The adopted method is simple and interesting. （中间是对论文的概述）The research is significant since it studies real dataset, and the results are valid. It has rarely been done before; it is more effective compared with previous similar models; and its effectiveness has been examined according to certain criteria.
Also suggest authors cite 1-2 related papers published in the KBS journal in 2015. 返回小木虫查看更多