重投求助(analytica chimica acta)
On the basis of the review(s) appended below, we regret that your manuscript cannot be accepted in its present form for publication in ACA. However, it is the opinion of the Editor that there is potential merit in the work described and that a thorough consideration of the reviewer comments might result in a publishable paper. We would therefore be willing to consider a new manuscript that describes this work. Since this will be considered as a new submittal, it can be submitted online at any future time. In such a case, in the cover letter please address the prior comments of the reviewers, detailing what changes have been made.
这种情况下,重投的编辑reviewer会是原来的审稿人吗?自己网上查了下,也是众说纷纭。我觉得基本上原来的comments都被我用实验或者数据解释了,如果换审稿人,再提一堆其他意见,也挺危险的。而且根据现有reviewer意见的改动,新的reviewer未必关注这点。纠结!
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
重新审稿时,一般审稿人都会看到以前的审稿意见的,这是对审稿人的尊重。提意见很正常,我见过一些这样的稿件,所以一定要认真回答前一次的意见。如果意见不是很负面的话,我一般都会给些正面意见,毕竟大家都在学术圈内,意见不合适也会影响自己的评审声誉。
我的也是遇到楼主同样的问题,希望都能够好运!
应该会参考之前的审稿意见
建议楼主重投之前先发个邮件给你之前的编辑,将论文修改稿和对编辑以及审稿人意见的回复给他看看,因为编辑对你论文重投的态度将会决定你论文的命运。如果他同意你重投的话机会是非常大的,如果他建议你不要重投,那就完全没有必要浪费时间了。此外,重投的话建议不要重新选审稿人,除非确实有审稿人和你的意见完全相左,送到他手上没有任何机会,不然尽量不要更换审稿人,