当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >求助审稿人意见,很纠结!

求助审稿人意见,很纠结!

作者 心随意动
来源: 小木虫 250 5 举报帖子
+关注

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are attached and copied below. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that includes such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.

To revise your manuscript, log into ACS Paragon Plus at https://paragonplus.acs.org/login and select "My Authoring Activity". There you will find your manuscript title listed under "Expired Revisions and Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration." With the exception of your main text file, all of your original files will be available to you for review or replacement during the resubmission process. If you need to replace a file, please be sure to remove the original before uploading a new one. In all circumstances you must upload a new manuscript text file.

When submitting your resubmitted manuscript through ACS Paragon Plus, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the text box provided or by attaching a file containing your detailed responses to all of the points raised by the reviewers.

Prior to submitting the manuscript, ensure that the manuscript addresses the following point:

Supporting Information:
(1) Supporting Information requires a cover page including title, author list, author affiliations, and corresponding author's email as in the manuscript.

At your option you can provide a graphic for the Table of Contents.  For information on this, please read our Guidelines for Table of Contents/Abstract Graphics (https://pubs.acs.org/paragonplus ... cs_guidelines.pdf).

With sincere regards,

Benny D. Freeman
Associate Editor
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

这是编辑意见。还有两个两个审稿人的意见,第一个的问题比较难回答,第二个就单词和小问题了,不难。
1、求助编辑这是拒稿还是怎么着。
2、是修改后重新当做新的一篇文章投吗?那编辑还是原来的编辑?审稿人呢?跟投新的文章流程一样吗?
3、还是当做修改稿投呢,但它又不是修改,修改的应该是附件中第一张图片:submit revision,而我的是第二张resubmit
实在不知道怎么办了,第一次投文章,求大牛们指教,不胜感激!

求助审稿人意见,很纠结!
1.png


求助审稿人意见,很纠结!-1
2.png 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • julycie

    一般老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你打修

  • julycie

    老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你大修

  • 心随意动

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by julycie at 2015-07-22 09:27:30
    老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你大修

    The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
    那这是什么意思呢

  • chdozh

    编辑给你大修,需要根据referees' comments 补实验。

  • 15170078114

    楼主,我有篇文章跟你一样的回复,你的现在怎么样了

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓