当前位置: 首页 > 专业外语 >这句话太啰嗦了,怎么表达比较恰当?

这句话太啰嗦了,怎么表达比较恰当?

作者 fairy3636
来源: 小木虫 200 4 举报帖子
+关注

It is found that one wavefront measurement is sufficient to fully characterize the coma aberration field and  two wavefront measurements are sufficient to characterize the astigmatism aberration field when 3rd order model is used; four wavefront measurements are sufficient to fully characterize the coma aberration field and  six wavefront measurements are sufficient to characterize the astigmatism aberration field when 5th order model is used. 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • seeker91

    好长好长啊,不过哇哦,祝福祝福

  • yusi9009

    你可以突出以下区别,把语序换成when 3rd order model is used时,用一个怎么样,用两个怎么样。然后when 5th order model is used时,用四个怎么样,用六个怎么样。而且你sufficient用得太多了,其实能替换的词不少吧。

  • fairy3636

    引用回帖:
    3楼: Originally posted by yusi9009 at 2015-07-22 08:40:55
    你可以突出以下区别,把语序换成when 3rd order model is used时,用一个怎么样,用两个怎么样。然后when 5th order model is used时,用四个怎么样,用六个怎么样。而且你sufficient用得太多了,其实能替换的词不少 ...

    中文的意思是:
    当使用三级模型的时候,一次波前测量足以描述慧差场,两次波前测量足以描述像散场;
    当使用五级模型的时候,四次波前测量足以描述慧差场,六次波前测量足以描述像散场;


    就是不知道如何表达能够更简洁

  • peterflyer

    It is found that one wavefront measurement is sufficient to fully characterize the coma aberration field and  the twos for the astigmatism aberration field as 3rd order model is used; and the fours  for the coma aberration field and  sixs for the astigmatism aberration field as 5th order model is used respectively.

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓