SCI文章悲剧了。。
三个审稿人，一个小修，一个大修，还有一个拒稿。其中拒稿的原因如下：
The manuscript deals with an interesting research topic. However, there are important reasons for recommending the rejection of the manuscript.
The introduction section is excessively long. It does not justify the novelty and the contribution to the field of the research performed. The objectives are not stated clearly.
The experimental design is not appropriated. The experiments were not repeated. Therefore, the results showed in the manuscript are not statistically significant.
最后一点这个拒稿意见是什么意思？实验重复了吗？编辑意见还挺有好的，说可以修改后重投，想搞清楚这个审稿人拒稿的原因。。请大神帮忙看一下吧
返回小木虫查看更多
今日热帖
京公网安备 11010802022153号
感觉这个审稿人没提什么实质性的问题 就把我的文章拒了 好难过
碰着不友好的了，实在不行改投吧。能中的期刊有的是。
拒稿的原因可能是文章结构有点乱，重新调整哈结构看看。
脿脜 脨禄脨禄 脦脪脪陋脳脨脧赂赂脛脪禄脧脗 脰脴脥露
The manuscript deals with an interesting research topic. However, there are important reasons for recommending the rejection of the manuscript.
研究的课题比较有趣，但是真的不能录用啊，文章有致命伤（ important reasons ）
The introduction section is excessively long. It does not justify the novelty and the contribution to the field of the research performed. The objectives are not stated clearly.
简介部分太长了，且文章的意义没有足够说明和和眼睛内容也不够新颖。关键是，实验对象真的没有标书清楚啊
The experimental design is not appropriated. The experiments were not repeated. Therefore, the results showed in the manuscript are not statistically significant.
实验设计不太好。而且文中实验的重复性不够，因为实验结果也没有统计学意义。
如果是语言方面的问题，我们公司能帮您解决，
你这个意见，没有读明白，一个小修，一个大修，一个拒稿，但编辑还是给你修改机会了？
那就改吧。 这个拒稿的意见，估计编辑也看了，但人家认为你可以说清楚，所以，就给你了个修改的机会，如你所说，你做了5组数据，那么就把数据分析列上，回复这个审稿人，就修改好了。没啥大不了的。
不要灰心。
实验方法无新意，introduction 太长，实验没有平行，无统计学意义