审稿真心快....3个星期就给答复。一个说publish as it is。一个说小修。但是小修的审稿意见有点看不到。求大家给点意见：）
Referee: 2

Comments to the Author
This is a good piece of work that should be published in this journal; however I do feel there are some areas that can be addressed:

The introduction is detailed but reads like a shopping list. Increased detail to better explain where this paper fits in the context and to improve readability would greatly strength it for the journal. Furthermore, the last section of the introduction is just an extension of the abstract and should be saved for the conclusion.

The last section of your report shows that as dye removal systems your hydrogels can be reused with a small loss in efficiency. However can you give any reason for the observed loss in efficiency? After soaking in ethanol is the hydrogel degraded or is it incomplete removal of dye from the gel? These could be tested for by seeing if reuse of gel affects mechanical strength or bond properties.

Improving the introduction and answering these questions regarding the final part of the experiment would lift this paper and make it a much stronger submission.

一：关于 “Increased detail to better explain where this paper fits in the context and to improve readability would greatly strength it for the journal. Furthermore, the last section of the introduction is just an extension of the abstract and should be saved for the conclusion. ”这句话 是让我在introduction再增加点内容能够承上启下吗？还有他说introduction最后一部分只是摘要的扩充，让我saved for the conclusion，是让我删introduction最后一部分还是删conclusion里面的部分啊？
二：“These could be tested for by seeing if reuse of gel affects mechanical strength or bond properties. ”这句话实在没有琢磨明白 是让我补充数据吗？？

谢谢各位虫友...我就这么点金币 全散了 等接收了我换另外一个号再散10倍金币！谢谢大家！ 返回小木虫查看更多