APL 投稿 请大家帮忙看看评审意见
我是新人,金币不多,尽量给大家发,谢谢大家!
今年投了一篇APL,纳米传感器方面的。
一审回来编辑让修改 :
The reviewers' comments are included below and/or attached. In view of their recommendations, we cannot accept your paper for publication in its present form. If you revise the paper to meet the reviewers' objections, we will be happy to give it further consideration.
一审两个审稿人,一个给出具体修改意见,另一个认为我们这篇文章is an extension of a previous publication by the same authors,建议改投其他期刊。
最后编辑还提出一些修改意见:
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----
* Please do not use "new" and "novel"; if the findings are not new or novel, they should not be submitted to APL. Other priority claims, such as "for the first time", should be eliminated. Similarly, "to our knowledge" and "successfully" are not allowed.
* Figure sub-labels must be uniform: enclose your figure sub-labels in parentheses and be sure to close the parentheses around the sub-labels, i.e. (a) and not a).
* Do not use computerese in figures. Do not use "E" or "e" for powers of 10 - i.e., 1 x 10... - NOT 1E3.
这种情况怎么办,有希望吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
可以说下你的期刊名称吗?
楼主跟我的情况一模一样,我已经提交了修改稿,希望我们都能中!
APL
后来结果怎么样
,
我的已经刊登出来了,你的呢?