APL 投稿 请大家帮忙看看评审意见
我是新人,金币不多,尽量给大家发,谢谢大家!
今年投了一篇APL,纳米传感器方面的。
一审回来编辑让修改 :
The reviewers' comments are included below and/or attached. In view of their recommendations, we cannot accept your paper for publication in its present form. If you revise the paper to meet the reviewers' objections, we will be happy to give it further consideration.
一审两个审稿人,一个给出具体修改意见,另一个认为我们这篇文章is an extension of a previous publication by the same authors,建议改投其他期刊。
最后编辑还提出一些修改意见:
----------------------------------------------------------------- ----
* Please do not use "new" and "novel"; if the findings are not new or novel, they should not be submitted to APL. Other priority claims, such as "for the first time", should be eliminated. Similarly, "to our knowledge" and "successfully" are not allowed.
* Figure sub-labels must be uniform: enclose your figure sub-labels in parentheses and be sure to close the parentheses around the sub-labels, i.e. (a) and not a).
* Do not use computerese in figures. Do not use "E" or "e" for powers of 10 - i.e., 1 x 10... - NOT 1E3.
这种情况怎么办,有希望吗?
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
希望很大,本人亲历
好运
比较积极的回复了。。写回信的时候客气一点,希望不小哦~
APL的话编辑意见还是比较重要的,既然给了修改,最终接收的机会很大,严格按审稿人给的意见逐条修改并说明,应该问题不大。祝顺利!
请问楼主,你投多长时间给回复的审稿意见啊,这个杂志审稿快吗?我有一篇文章,按照这个写的,已改好,准备这几天投。谢谢!
28天给的回复,编辑前期找评审人浪费了7、8天,不然挺快的
,
谢谢大家,我会好好改的,希望好运!