投出去一个月终于有回复了，但感觉有点模糊，并没有明确拒搞，但也没有给修改期限，大神参谋一下
Thank you for submitting the above-mentioned manuscript. Given the comments made by the referees it is clear that although your findings are interesting they do not represent a sufficient basis for publication in Angewandte Chemie at the present time and that further experimental work and clarifications are required. Once you have obtained significant new results that are pertinent to the referees' comments, we would be willing to reassess an appropriately supplemented manuscript, which should be resubmitted as a new submission.

Please include under "Additional Information" the Manuscript ID as well as a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments. The manuscript will be sent back to the same referees provided that they are available. If necessary an impartial new referee may be asked for advice.

We hope that you will understand our decision on this matter.
REVIEWER REPORT

EVALUATION:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

1. Please rate the importance of the reported results

Reviewer #1: Highly important (top 20%)

Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%)

--------------------

2. Please rate the citation of previous publications

Reviewer #1: Insufficient

Reviewer #2: Appropriate

--------------------

3. Please rate the length of the manuscript

Reviewer #1: Concise

Reviewer #2: Concise

--------------------

4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data

Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies

Reviewer #2: Major inconsistencies

--------------------

5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate

Reviewer #1:
*----

Reviewer #2: (No Response) 返回小木虫查看更多