| 查看: 4084 | 回复: 14 | |||
[交流]
angew这样的回复还有希望吗
|
|||
|
投出去一个月终于有回复了，但感觉有点模糊，并没有明确拒搞，但也没有给修改期限，大神参谋一下 Thank you for submitting the above-mentioned manuscript. Given the comments made by the referees it is clear that although your findings are interesting they do not represent a sufficient basis for publication in Angewandte Chemie at the present time and that further experimental work and clarifications are required. Once you have obtained significant new results that are pertinent to the referees' comments, we would be willing to reassess an appropriately supplemented manuscript, which should be resubmitted as a new submission. Please include under "Additional Information" the Manuscript ID as well as a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments. The manuscript will be sent back to the same referees provided that they are available. If necessary an impartial new referee may be asked for advice. We hope that you will understand our decision on this matter. REVIEWER REPORT EVALUATION: Reviewer's Responses to Questions 1. Please rate the importance of the reported results Reviewer #1: Highly important (top 20%) Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%) -------------------- 2. Please rate the citation of previous publications Reviewer #1: Insufficient Reviewer #2: Appropriate -------------------- 3. Please rate the length of the manuscript Reviewer #1: Concise Reviewer #2: Concise -------------------- 4. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies Reviewer #2: Major inconsistencies -------------------- 5. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate Reviewer #1: *---- Reviewer #2: (No Response) |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
RSC ADV拒稿重投这还有希望么
已经有44人回复
- 投稿《Science》，审了一个月，给了4段话的意见，拒稿。
已经有74人回复
- 投Angew审稿人给出这样的评分，修改重投是否有机会？
已经有8人回复
- 发邮件给导师，导师的回复，是什么意思啊?有希望吗？求助~~
已经有13人回复
- 西安交大的导师这样回复有没有希望啊？
已经有19人回复
- 修改被拒，请问这样还可以重投么？
已经有10人回复
- 德国应用化学审稿状态一直是Under Review，已经一个星期了，请问有希望没
已经有19人回复
- nature communication 修回再投拒稿！
已经有33人回复
- 比较奇怪的拒稿信，发出来给大家看看！
已经有5人回复
- 三个审稿人，一个不同意，编辑给拒了
已经有10人回复
- 德国应用化学（Angew Chem Int Edit）关于编辑部回复信的两个问题
已经有6人回复
- 投Adv Mater文章被拒，重投有戏没？
已经有21人回复
- RSC Advances综述--minor revision
已经有32人回复
- angew revision 多久会有结果？
已经有6人回复
- 大家投angewandte chemie-international edition一般多久给回复？投过的虫友指点下
已经有14人回复
- 小硕第一次投《地理与地理信息科学》，得到这样的回复，还有希望发表吗？
已经有23人回复
- 投稿三个月，编辑回信reviewer换人了，这论文还有戏吗？
已经有22人回复
- 我的审稿人当天就返回了审稿意见，是不是就悲剧了？
已经有11人回复
13楼2015-06-19 06:06:09
2楼2015-06-18 22:45:34
5楼2015-06-18 22:52:30
6楼2015-06-18 22:57:25
8楼2015-06-18 22:58:22
10楼2015-06-18 23:14:49
11楼2015-06-19 00:11:37
12楼2015-06-19 06:03:57
14楼2015-07-20 18:07:49
15楼2015-08-04 09:49:33
简单回复
退化or进化3楼
2015-06-18 22:45
回复
冰炎jj(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2015-06-18 22:49
回复
冰炎jj(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 [ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
2015-06-18 22:57
回复
冰炎jj(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2wei9楼
2015-06-18 23:12
回复
q [ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]