第一篇SSCI论文，请看下这个意见怎样回复为好。第一次发帖，不知道金币什么的怎么弄，承诺所有对问题回答这都发金币，若论文顺利，散尽金币致谢虫友，但是这段时间要先修论文，而且暂时没空研究金币规则，
如有不合适的地方，请虫友指出，也请版主协助处理。谢谢
情况说明：本文是关于方法的论文，最后用了一个企业案例对所提方法进行应用。企业的信息是采用4位专家的评价信息。

审稿人提的意见：
The case study is based on the judgment results of only 4 experts. Is it sufficient to use only 4 opinions for the determination of weight of factors and subsequently for the generation of implications for technology commercialization forecasting? Although its purpose is to illustrate the applicability of the presented method, the manuscript should prove that no matter how small the number of respondents is, the discussions about the results (in section 4.2) are still valid. It will be helpful to bring some references to bear on this point. 返回小木虫查看更多