6个数据点确实太少了。你当时是怎么确定只用6个的?

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by goddiao at 2015-06-15 20:56:25
6个数据点确实太少了。你当时是怎么确定只用6个的?

看其他文献一般是5-10只动物

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by hekai16 at 2015-06-15 23:05:36
看其他文献一般是5-10只动物...

好了，这个就是你的切入点了，看看别人的文章是怎么说明这个样本量的问题的。然后引经据典说明审稿人就行了。下面给你一个模板吧。
Response: Thanks for the comments. We have determined the sample size based on an comprehensive review of the existing literature. As listed in references XX-XX, the sample sizes adopted ranged from 5-10. Here, we selected the sample size to be 5 to be consistent with these published results. This also allows us to compare our results with others on a consistent basis. With regard to the statistical power, the authors have to admit that the sample size might be inadequate to conduct such a analysis. However, we would like to assure you that this does not affect the results and their significance
，

引用回帖:

4楼: Originally posted by goddiao at 2015-06-15 23:39:50
好了，这个就是你的切入点了，看看别人的文章是怎么说明这个样本量的问题的。然后引经据典说明审稿人就行了。下面给你一个模板吧。
Response: Thanks for the comments. We have determined the sample size base ...

不好意思，应该是such an analysis..

引用回帖:

4楼: Originally posted by goddiao at 2015-06-15 21:39:50
好了，这个就是你的切入点了，看看别人的文章是怎么说明这个样本量的问题的。然后引经据典说明审稿人就行了。下面给你一个模板吧。
Response: Thanks for the comments. We have determined the sample size base ...

谢谢你的回复参考，不知道你熟悉如何计算统计功效么？

引用回帖:

6楼: Originally posted by hekai16 at 2015-06-16 12:45:55
谢谢你的回复参考，不知道你熟悉如何计算统计功效么？...

不好意思，这个不是我的专长，你去网上查查吧。应该有tutorial

我也遇到了同样的审稿意见。。。不知道楼主最后怎么回的？跪求！