大侠们,能不能帮我分析一下我的拒稿文章是重投还是改投!谢谢大家。
小弟,我投了一个杂志被拒稿了。
编辑的意见如下:Should you decide to revise or submit similar work for consideration at a later date, it may be more suited for consideration as a Technical Note. This is not an inferior category of article but simply a more technically-oriented paper.
审稿人一给的意见:The paper approaches an interesting problemexpecially in consideration of the fact that it tries to relate simulation findings with experimental medical evidences. However, the paper is very difficult to follow and read (possibly due to a poor writing) which makes too difficult to appreciate and validate the paper findings.
审稿人二的意见:The novelty and contribution of the paper.后面三页A4纸的审稿意见。
审稿人三的意见:This reviewer has mixed feelings about this manuscript. Besides really appreciating the idea and the novelty of the study, this reviewer does not feel confident with the methods presented and the structure of the study. For this reasons, I suggest this work not being accepted for publication.
我想重投,不知道重投的概率大吗?希望大侠们帮忙分一下,谢谢大家。 返回小木虫查看更多
我觉得你这个稿件大修一下改投比较好,没看出来这几个审稿人对你的稿件评价很好。
No problem at all!
无故被警告,非常失望,我不再应助!
but i find your message interesting, and that's why i answered!
anyway, good luck!
check carefully with the English and the structure for your manuscript.
for the third reviewer's comments, you may rethink about how to explain in a more convincing way in your methodology
,
祝福祝福
编辑建议修改以后作为Technical Note发表,所以个人建议改投其他杂志作为"article"文章发表,祝好运!
我也有点想改投,谢谢!