小弟，我投了一个杂志被拒稿了。
编辑的意见如下：Should you decide to revise or submit similar work for consideration at a later date, it may be more suited for consideration as a Technical Note. This is not an inferior category of article but simply a more technically-oriented paper.
审稿人一给的意见：The paper approaches an interesting problemexpecially in consideration of the fact that it tries to relate simulation findings with experimental medical evidences. However, the paper is very difficult to follow and read (possibly due to a poor writing) which makes too difficult to appreciate and validate the paper findings.
审稿人二的意见：The novelty and contribution of the paper.后面三页A4纸的审稿意见。
审稿人三的意见：This reviewer has mixed feelings about this manuscript. Besides really appreciating the idea and the novelty of the study, this reviewer does not feel confident with the methods presented and the structure of the study. For this reasons, I suggest this work not being accepted for publication.


我想重投，不知道重投的概率大吗？希望大侠们帮忙分一下，谢谢大家。 返回小木虫查看更多