| 查看: 1981 | 回复: 10 | |||
[交流]
虫友们给看看审稿人的意见,还有机会吗?
|
|
虫友们,帮忙看看审稿人的意见,看看是否有机会中哦!谢谢! Reviewers' comments: The paper reports the structure and properties of (AlCrMnMoNiZrB0.1)Nx coatings. These multielement coatings are rather new and original. However the quality of the paper needs to be improved. Please see the following comments: 1. Grammar errors occur throughout the paper; English needs to be improved. Some errors are even technical. Just to name a few: P3, L10 XRD stands for "X-ray Diffraction", not "X-ray diffractometer". P3, L12 Surface morphology is typically "observed" instead of "obtained". P8, L8 Verb is mssing in this sentence. P8, L9 This while sentence is ambiguous. Please perform a thorough check and have native speaker check your English. 2. The Boron content in your target should be only 1.64 at.%. But the EPMA results suggest that the alloy film have a B content of ~9 at.%. This is almost six times higher than that in the target and is very unusual. How did this happen? Did you check the composition of your target? Note that even in the nitride films the B content is still much higher than it should be. 3. The authors claim that the peak in deposition rate at Rn=0.5 is due to re-sputtering of Al atoms. However, unlike your ref. 20, there is no Al deficient in your alloy film. Therefore there is no apparent re-sputtering of Al in your film and this reason does not make sense. 4. P6, final line. "bombardment by energetic discharge species led to a relatively strong re-sputtering effect", please provide some reference for this statement. 5. Can you provide more discussion regarding the tribological properties of the films? Particularly why the friction coefficient is so low relative to other multi-element nitride films. Additions of the editor: -the accuracy of the method of Scherrer to determine the crystallite size is only about 10%. Consequently, the results of this technique cannot be presented with more than two digits. Values in the manuscript should be rounded off. Please, note that "crystallite" is a better term than "grain". -The research highlights should be appropriate for stand-alone reading so every symbol should be explicitly defined. |
» 猜你喜欢
娱乐
已经有4人回复
纯娱乐,不喜欢勿喷
已经有8人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
面上提前没消息,有中的吗
已经有17人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
最近投过materials and manufacturing processes 或者有经验的虫友们看过来
已经有3人回复
有投稿时附带推荐审稿人的进来看看
已经有28人回复
审稿意见回来了,虫友们帮我看看该怎么回答呢?
已经有4人回复
审稿人给的建议是“major revisions”,大家看文章还有戏吗?
已经有38人回复
PRL 审稿意见求助
已经有4人回复
急啊!!投过中国科学的虫友们帮帮忙,看看这个审稿意见怎么回!!在线等啊!
已经有9人回复
虫友们,看看PLos one的这个审稿意见是什么意思,求指教!谢谢
已经有6人回复
审稿人给了审稿意见,全是手写的,龙飞凤舞,麻烦高手来指导一下
已经有3人回复
怎么回答审稿人,虫友们,给个意见哈~
已经有4人回复
帮忙看看审稿人这句话什么意思,我该如何作答,关于多酸球无序的问题
已经有3人回复
虫友们来看看编辑回复的意思是不是有审稿人建议把文章拒了
已经有40人回复
拜托各位做锂离子的虫友们给看看审稿意见
已经有2人回复
虫友们帮忙看看怎么回复。
已经有1人回复
虫友们看看这个审稿人的回复 ,俺有点不懂啊
已经有2人回复
有些希望,在此想感谢很多虫友们
已经有52人回复
投稿SCI期刊(小修),编辑给的意见,有经验的虫友们给出出主意啊!
已经有15人回复
虫友们看看这句话什么意思,怎么修改
已经有4人回复
没有审稿人意见
已经有11人回复
本小虫试总结的小木虫好帖集合[电子书版本(.umd)]以及网址链接集合
已经有255人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
国自然发榜在即:此刻的你,是什么心情?
+2/944
坐标北京,92男,诚征结婚对象
+1/166
坐标广州,征女友
+2/132
西湖大学物理学、光学、电子信息方向博士生招生(长期有效)
+5/100
威格科技张德龙:二十年深耕,铸就国产惰性气氛设备新高度
+1/87
药化高级研究员
+1/77
华东理工大学 生物工程学院 生物反应器工程国家重点室 博士后招聘
+1/76
小木虫是我和国基唯一的人脉,现在都感觉快断了
+1/65
2026年University of South Carolina继续招收博士生
+1/62
采用本质安全型氢气流量控制的化学合成 - Alicat ISMC本安防爆质量流量控制器
+2/52
西湖大学拓扑光学、非厄米光学、太赫兹方向博士后招聘(长期有效)
+5/15
瑞典林雪平大学 高峰课题组 诚聘 氮化物基无机材料方向 博士后1名
+1/11
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/5
国科金评审方式改革建议
+1/5
北理工集成电路杰青团队 | 诚招科助理
+1/5
高弯曲强度玻璃制品的特殊加工工艺
+1/5
【香港城市大学】范战西教授课题组现招收博士生(全奖, 2027年秋季入学)
+1/4
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/4
准现货/原装全新超微整机8x NVIDIA HGX A100 80G
+1/3
国家自然科学基金申报者发榜前心理状态调查,麻烦帮忙填一下哇!
+1/3
2楼2011-02-07 08:43:09
3楼2011-02-07 08:51:54
4楼2011-02-07 09:32:37
5楼2011-02-07 11:22:25
6楼2011-02-07 11:40:29
7楼2011-02-07 11:49:12
8楼2011-02-07 12:27:15
9楼2011-02-07 13:18:58
10楼2011-02-08 15:40:59
11楼2011-02-08 16:29:36










回复此楼