24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (1319)
>虫友互识 (111)
>论文道贺祈福 (40)
>导师招生 (23)
>仿真模拟 (23)
>基金申请 (16)
>硕博家园 (16)
>考研 (14)
>公派出国 (13)
>博后之家 (12)
>找工作 (12)
>论文投稿 (11)
>休闲灌水 (11)
>考博 (10)
>教师之家 (9)
>文献求助 (6)

返回列表

robot121

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 732.3
帖子: 57
在线: 43.5小时
虫号: 780603

[交流] 虫友们给看看审稿人的意见，还有机会吗？

虫友们，帮忙看看审稿人的意见，看看是否有机会中哦！谢谢！
Reviewers' comments:

The paper reports the structure and properties of (AlCrMnMoNiZrB0.1)Nx coatings. These multielement coatings are rather new and original. However the quality of the paper needs to be improved. Please see the following comments:

1. Grammar errors occur throughout the paper; English needs to be improved. Some errors are even technical.
Just to name a few:
P3, L10       XRD stands for "X-ray Diffraction", not "X-ray diffractometer".
P3, L12       Surface morphology is typically "observed" instead of "obtained".
P8, L8       Verb is mssing in this sentence.
P8, L9       This while sentence is ambiguous.
Please perform a thorough check and have native speaker check your English.

2. The Boron content in your target should be only 1.64 at.%. But the EPMA results suggest that the alloy film have a B content of ~9 at.%. This is almost six times higher than that in the target and is very unusual. How did this happen? Did you check the composition of your target? Note that even in the nitride films the B content is still much higher than it should be.

3. The authors claim that the peak in deposition rate at Rn=0.5 is due to re-sputtering of Al atoms. However, unlike your ref. 20, there is no Al deficient in your alloy film. Therefore there is no apparent re-sputtering of Al in your film and this reason does not make sense.

4. P6, final line.
"bombardment by energetic discharge species led to a relatively strong re-sputtering effect", please provide some reference for this statement.

5. Can you provide more discussion regarding the tribological properties of the films? Particularly why the friction coefficient is so low relative to other multi-element nitride films.

Additions of the editor:
-the accuracy of the method of Scherrer to determine the crystallite size is only about 10%. Consequently, the results of this technique cannot be presented with more than two digits. Values in the manuscript should be rounded off. Please, note that "crystallite" is a better term than "grain".
-The research highlights should be appropriate for stand-alone reading so every symbol should be explicitly defined.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

药化及相关博士的申请已经有3人回复
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活已经有4人回复
一个化合物的合成路线：CAS:367929-02-0 名称：8β-乙烯基雌二醇已经有4人回复
太白金星有点烦已经有3人回复
中国地质大学（北京）博士招生补录，数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业已经有3人回复
河北省自然基金已经有8人回复
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评已经有3人回复
考博已经有3人回复
有没有快的中文核心比较快录用的，纳米材料光催化已经有4人回复
有人投过CCC中国控制会议吗？已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

最近投过materials and manufacturing processes 或者有经验的虫友们看过来已经有3人回复
有投稿时附带推荐审稿人的进来看看已经有28人回复
审稿意见回来了，虫友们帮我看看该怎么回答呢？已经有4人回复
审稿人给的建议是“major revisions”,大家看文章还有戏吗？已经有38人回复
PRL 审稿意见求助已经有4人回复
急啊！！投过中国科学的虫友们帮帮忙，看看这个审稿意见怎么回！！在线等啊！已经有9人回复
虫友们，看看PLos one的这个审稿意见是什么意思，求指教！谢谢已经有6人回复
审稿人给了审稿意见，全是手写的，龙飞凤舞，麻烦高手来指导一下已经有3人回复
怎么回答审稿人，虫友们，给个意见哈~ 已经有4人回复
帮忙看看审稿人这句话什么意思，我该如何作答，关于多酸球无序的问题已经有3人回复
虫友们来看看编辑回复的意思是不是有审稿人建议把文章拒了已经有40人回复
拜托各位做锂离子的虫友们给看看审稿意见已经有2人回复
虫友们帮忙看看怎么回复。已经有1人回复
虫友们看看这个审稿人的回复，俺有点不懂啊已经有2人回复
有些希望，在此想感谢很多虫友们已经有52人回复
投稿SCI期刊（小修），编辑给的意见，有经验的虫友们给出出主意啊！已经有15人回复
虫友们看看这句话什么意思，怎么修改已经有4人回复
没有审稿人意见已经有11人回复
本小虫试总结的小木虫好帖集合[电子书版本(.umd)]以及网址链接集合已经有255人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2011-02-07 08:33:50

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 78 (初中生)
金币: 12705.7
帖子: 1478
在线: 820.2小时
虫号: 898876

有机会

robot121(金币+1): 2011-02-07 09:37:38

引用回帖:

Originally posted by robot121 at 2011-02-07 08:33:50:
虫友们，帮忙看看审稿人的意见，看看是否有机会中哦！谢谢！
Reviewers' comments:

The paper reports the structure and properties of (AlCrMnMoNiZrB0.1)Nx coatings. These multielement coatings are ...

你论文语法错的很多，好好修改。
最主要是你的一个系数问题，这个问题要回答清楚。