应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » 虫友们给看看审稿人的意见，还有机会吗？
51/1返回列表
查看: 2146  |  回复: 10
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

robot121

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 虫友们给看看审稿人的意见，还有机会吗？

虫友们，帮忙看看审稿人的意见，看看是否有机会中哦！谢谢！
Reviewers' comments:


The paper reports the structure and properties of (AlCrMnMoNiZrB0.1)Nx coatings. These multielement coatings are rather new and original. However the quality of the paper needs to be improved. Please see the following comments:

1. Grammar errors occur throughout the paper; English needs to be improved. Some errors are even technical.
Just to name a few:
P3, L10        XRD stands for "X-ray Diffraction", not "X-ray diffractometer".
P3, L12        Surface morphology is typically "observed" instead of "obtained".
P8, L8         Verb is mssing in this sentence.
P8, L9         This while sentence is ambiguous.
Please perform a thorough check and have native speaker check your English.

2. The Boron content in your target should be only 1.64 at.%. But the EPMA results suggest that the alloy film have a B content of ~9 at.%. This is almost six times higher than that in the target and is very unusual. How did this happen? Did you check the composition of your target? Note that even in the nitride films the B content is still much higher than it should be.

3. The authors claim that the peak in deposition rate at Rn=0.5 is due to re-sputtering of Al atoms. However, unlike your ref. 20, there is no Al deficient in your alloy film. Therefore there is no apparent re-sputtering of Al in your film and this reason does not make sense.

4. P6, final line.
"bombardment by energetic discharge species led to a relatively strong re-sputtering effect", please provide some reference for this statement.

5. Can you provide more discussion regarding the tribological properties of the films? Particularly why the friction coefficient is so low relative to other multi-element nitride films.

Additions of the editor:
-the accuracy of the method of Scherrer to determine the crystallite size is only about 10%. Consequently, the results of this technique cannot be presented with more than two digits. Values in the manuscript should be rounded off. Please, note that "crystallite" is a better term than "grain".
-The research highlights should be appropriate for stand-alone reading so every symbol should be explicitly defined.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2011-02-07 08:33:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

pepperp

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
robot121(金币+1): 2011-02-07 09:37:48
只有让修改就有很大的机会
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2011-02-07 09:32:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

ziyeweng

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

有机会

robot121(金币+1): 2011-02-07 09:37:38
引用回帖:
Originally posted by robot121 at 2011-02-07 08:33:50:
虫友们，帮忙看看审稿人的意见，看看是否有机会中哦！谢谢！
Reviewers' comments:


The paper reports the structure and properties of (AlCrMnMoNiZrB0.1)Nx coatings. These multielement coatings are ...

你论文语法错的很多，好好修改。
最主要是你的一个系数问题，这个问题要回答清楚。
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2011-02-07 08:43:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

skyhawk006

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
只要让你修就有机会，无论是大修还是小修
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2011-02-07 11:22:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

starared

禁虫 (著名写手)
很有机会,但必须认真修改!
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2011-02-07 11:40:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭