当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 >大家部帮我看看这个审稿人的意见,是reject还是revise

大家部帮我看看这个审稿人的意见,是reject还是revise

作者 jianjunjiang
来源: 小木虫 500 10 举报帖子
+关注

in this work, the divalent cation adsorption on the periphery of the large pore in monolayer graphene oxide membranes acts on water desalination have been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. it reports that the presence of the divalent cation on the rim of the pore can not only reduce the amount of the salt ions located in the region around the pore but also prolong their permeation time across the pore, subsequently leading to the remarkable enhancement of the salt rejection rate. moreover, the role of graphene oxidation degree on water desalination is also elucidated. the water desalination performance of the pore with adsorbed divalent cation is more robust against oxidation degree variation. this result offers significant instructions to the excogitation of the new nanoporous graphene oxide membranes for high-performance water desalination. even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:

(1) how the mg 2+ ions fixed near the pore in the simulations? how to maintain the stability of mg 2+ ions in md simulations?
(2) how does salt ion distribution affect salt rejection rate? is there a quantitative relationship?
(3) authors reported that the pore exhibits an excellent desalination performance at some certain oxidation. can this optimized parameter be defined in md simulation? 返回小木虫查看更多

今日热帖
  • 精华评论
  • 一季晴天

    修订后接收,就是个大修或中修的审稿意见。

  • jianjunjiang

    引用回帖:
    2楼: Originally posted by 一季晴天 at 2021-05-31 13:21:09
    修订后接收,就是个大修或中修的审稿意见。

    谢谢!

  • 奋斗的cat

    很常规的叙述,有一句肯定了你的工作,问题看起来也不刁钻大概率修改后接受了

  • bobvan

    "even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:"

    需要修改后才有被接收的可能

  • 国际科学编辑

    基于这份review report,应该是major revision

  • jianjunjiang

    引用回帖:
    6楼: Originally posted by 国际科学编辑 at 2021-06-01 08:02:59
    基于这份review report,应该是major revision

    谢谢

  • xing122010

    从头到尾哪里提到拒稿了??明显是修改啊

猜你喜欢
下载小木虫APP
与700万科研达人随时交流
  • 二维码
  • IOS
  • 安卓