各位大神，本人投稿vacuum期刊，目前大修状态。该期刊编辑比较关注XPS测试，给的审稿意见如下：

For the surface and materials science scope of VACUUM, provide information for how the XPS was calibrated, the energy scale normalised, and the handling of charge referencing. Using adventitious carbon C1s is not advisable, if not risky, and should not be reported at face value without warning the reader about the uncertainties with the reported results: See and apply instead more reliable procedures in: Progress in Materials Science, 2019, 100591: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100591, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: towards reliable binding energy referencing, G.Greczynsky et al.

请问审稿意见是什么意思。我该如何改进论文，回复编辑。 返回小木虫查看更多