optics express两个审稿人 均建议大修，但第一个审稿人言辞比较激烈，认为我的文章创新型不足，但是我的文章的创新点跟他提到的创新点不太一样，可能是文章撰写时侧重点出现了问题。第二个审稿人是业内小同行，提了几个增加计算的问题

大修相应的增加了实验计算，最后第一个审稿人还是拒了，第二个审稿人同意接受。编辑还是给拒绝了

I regret to inform you that your revised manuscript does not suitably address the reviewers’ concerns. Therefore I cannot accept your manuscript in its present form for publication in Optics Express. The comments from re-review are included below.

It is the policy of Optics Express to allow only one revision cycle, so any resubmission of this manuscript in revised form will be treated as a new manuscript and given a new submission date.  The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of an inadequately revised manuscript.  Such papers will generally be rejected without being sent again for peer review.

想修改下摘要 介绍 题目更加凸显自己的创新点重新投，不知道有没有机会。各位有没有oe重投的经验 返回小木虫查看更多