一个小修,一个拒稿,主编给大修
碰上极端了,一个人说很好,有价值还帮我修改手稿。一个人说没有啥创新,有些方法是错误的(审稿人误解了)。主编给的态度是大修,还说reconsider your paper for publication。请问这个情况返修回去还要送给拒稿的审稿人吗,或者是找新的审稿人吗?
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. On the basis of their comments, I recommend major revision and that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider your paper for publication. For your guidance, the reviewers' comments are appended below. Reviewer#1 suggests publication with minor changes. Reviewer#2 suggests rejection on the basis of the limited novelty of your work, but also provides useful suggestions to improve your work. Your manuscript should be shortened and the reference list should only contain those references that are strictly necessary. If you decide to revise your manuscript, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point raised by Reviewers. This information should be listed in the "Author Comments" section.
返回小木虫查看更多
京公网安备 11010802022153号
好好改,有希望
我觉得以主编的态度为准
有希望,仔细改,问题不大。我两小修,一拒稿其中一个高度表扬文章有意义,编辑给的大修,认真回答问题,耐心解释,回稿一周就接受了。
,
都有可能